Archive for the ‘Hmmmm...’ Category

I’ve just about had enough. Anyone who wants to say something to me had better do so soon, because I’m not staying in a country that so disgracefully treats people who are down on their luck. Not that I can afford to go anywhere. I’m just going to vanish, unexpectedly, like the generousity and compassion of the British people did while I went travelling.

I suppose it should come as no surprise that the Child Support Agency behave strangely. In this case, the CSA have definately lost the plot. The proof is the letter I received from them today:

Continue reading ‘Child Support Oddness’ »

A response to the conjuring thread on the W3C Style mailing list, in which to everyone’s relief I shall no longer be participating. If the answer isn’t ready yet, that’s OK.

Laurens Holst wrote:

Yes, but XML is not HTML, fortunately.

I’m an engineer, not a philosopher, meaning I’m irritable, impatient and totally uninterested in moral arguments, which eliminates most of yours. I just don’t care.

Continue reading ‘XML Is Not HTML, Unfortunately’ »

O sweet perfume!

How my heart trembles to your touch.

My lover blooms,

and as a butterfly

I must find her scent,

return its strange caress.

I invite discussion on the future of Microsoft Internet Explorer. If things keep going the way they are, not only will I not care about IE, the figures will give me a reason not to.

Continue reading ‘MS Internet Explorer 43.4% (2nd)’ »

What the f**k is the Department of Trade and Industry doing with £35,018,993,000 in “non-operating appropriations in aid”? That’s as much as the entire NHS costs to run.

Please read the Appropriation (No. 3) Act 2005. Find out how much your government spends, on what and why.

Why? For access to your search history from anywhere on the internet.

Just be careful with the weather. Given the limited range of regions and cities available, Google are likely using it to target advertising. If I can’t have the weather for Kota Kinabalu, the service is of no use to me.

If I could offer my blackbird to trade its sweet voice for a weapon to thwart the hungry cat, how would it choose?

Warning!

This is a topic of inherent value / fundamental importance. Know your limits.

What does one advertise to people who want to read about “Violent Pornography on the Internet”?

According to Google, maternity clothes and pregnancy advice.

Is that tasteful or what? Machine intelligence at its best.

No better or worse than a MP who speaks in Parliament the names of websites publishing pornographic images, forever making the Parliamentary record an unsafe place for inquisitive children.

No better or worse than my bringing attention to it. My God, where will it end?

And left woefully ignorant of how.

Well, no, actually, the BBC didn’t say that. I just made that up. They couldn’t, but this programme sequence I’m watching might as well have that in BBC News headline format along the bottom. The do say you have to learn how to shop. What a work of genius.

“Learning Zone”, BBC2, 2am-4am. No-one is watching.

Almost perfect. Almost. Unfortunately, I was watching. Oops!

This is the message from the BBC. Tell everyone you know. “Treat yourself. Stop spending.” Shop with your mind, not with your heart. Do not enslave yourself to debt. Shops and banks are not trying to help you achieve your dreams. They are deliberately manipulating you to consume more than you need. You can have everything you want for cheaper if you put a little more effort into it and you can have more fun doing it.

Nowadays, you don’t even need to leave the comfort of your own home! Why shop at the mall if you can shop while having sex? What could be more perverse?
Continue reading ‘BBC admits “You Are All Conditioned For Consumption”’ »

More fun conversing with Google “I’m Feeling Lucky” searches. Or is it? Liberta, I respectfluffly challenge you to determine whether a computer or a human supplied these links in answer to these questions. Is this just technology or is it behaviour? It made me laugh.

“how the speed of light is measured” yields Measure The Speed of Light With Chocolate and A Microwave

“no really I want to know how the speed of light is measured” yields The Speed of Light which has the audacity to say that light always travels at a speed of 299,792,458 meters per second, no matter how its speed is measured.

What, even if I measure it with chocolate and a microwave?
Continue reading ‘How Did We Measure The Speed of Light?’ »